move Forward(Move Logic) Question

[kangkangjoo]

hi Yeah. 

I wonder move system 

For example, there is agent 1. I gave this agent a Move Forward 50.

In that situation, when 'agent1' entered the Bound, he wanted to slow down and gave 'Move Forward' 20.

What I want to ask is this situation.
In my opinion, the speed at which I thought it would be slowed down was faster or the speed was the same.

The conclusion from some tests is that
Move forward found that when you control with additional logic, it's not replaced by that logic, it's superimposed.

Is this the way you intended? Or was it made by a mistake?

I tried to control the traffic situation of cars by using Move. As a result, you designated the Move forward as 0 at the intersection or the point where the car should stop, and the car was not covered by the move forward, but added to the existing figure. So I could see it moving forward without stopping at the same speed. So I became curious about this Move system and wanted to answer it.

[Yeah YANG]

Hello kangkangjoo,

1.
Usually the default move speed need to specified in default logic, like 50 in your case.
Then other logic stop moving it, like 0 in your case.
So this can work together,

2.
If you make 2 regular logic nodes, one 50 without input language, another one 50 with in-bound logic, the agent will move 50 if the 2nd logic not active and move 25 if both active.
For arrange the priority, you can parent the 1st logic into 2nd one, then it will stop when 2nd logic active.

Cheers,
-Yeah

Dec 9, 2018 22:30:28 GMT -5 kangkangjoo said:

hi Yeah. 

I wonder move system 

For example, there is agent 1. I gave this agent a Move Forward 50.

In that situation, when 'agent1' entered the Bound, he wanted to slow down and gave 'Move Forward' 20.

What I want to ask is this situation.
In my opinion, the speed at which I thought it would be slowed down was faster or the speed was the same.

The conclusion from some tests is that
Move forward found that when you control with additional logic, it's not replaced by that logic, it's superimposed.

Is this the way you intended? Or was it made by a mistake?

I tried to control the traffic situation of cars by using Move. As a result, you designated the Move forward as 0 at the intersection or the point where the car should stop, and the car was not covered by the move forward, but added to the existing figure. So I could see it moving forward without stopping at the same speed. So I became curious about this Move system and wanted to answer it.

[kangkangjoo]

oh I understand

umm... I work traffic project

s there anything you can refer to? You erased the traffic system before.

[tom891]

Hi,
whether I understand correctly. Basing on the hierarchy of decisions from the appendix.


If the condition in A is true. Only Logic A is executed. B and C are omitted.

If the condition in A is not true. B is checked. If condiction in B is true, B is executed. C is omitted.

[kangkangjoo]

Dec 11, 2018 4:14:55 GMT -5 tom891 said:

Hi,
whether I understand correctly. Basing on the hierarchy of decisions from the appendix.


If the condition in A is true. Only Logic A is executed. B and C are omitted.

If the condition in A is not true. B is checked. If condiction in B is true, B is executed. C is omitted.

Testing seems to be the way you said it.